Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)

Citation
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Parent Document
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2010-01-19

Other Sections in This Document (180)

Full Text

609 chars
After the Chacons dismissed all but the three causes of action listed above, they moved for judgment on the pleadings, seeking to bar three of Litke’s affirmative defenses. These affirmative defenses were that Litke had complied with section 37.9 (Twelfth); that the Chacons’ failure to perform the conditions, covenants, and promises required by their tenancy excused Litke from permitting them to reoccupy the apartment (Sixteenth); and that res judicata and collateral estoppel barred the Chacons’ complaint (Seventeenth). At the hearing on the motion for judgment on the pleadings, counsel for Litke *1244