INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey (2018)

Citation
Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey (2018)
Parent Document
Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey (2018)
Effective Date
2018-08-31
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4532088/theodore-hayes-v-philip-harvey/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (144)

Full Text

488 chars 
unambiguous . . . we ordinarily do not consider statutory
purpose or legislative history.” Hesketh, 828 F.3d at 167.
Here, we include a brief discussion of purpose and legislative
history solely to demonstrate why Congress would have chosen
to enact this particular language—to show that this is not a case
where “literal application of the statute will produce a result
demonstrably at odds with the intention of its drafters.” Id.
(quoting In re Segal, 57 F.3d 342, 346 (3d Cir. 1995)).