Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

In Re D.C. Diamond Head, Inc., 51 B.R. 309 (1985)

Citation
In Re D.C. Diamond Head, Inc., 51 B.R. 309 (1985)
Parent Document
In Re D.C. Diamond Head, Inc., 51 B.R. 309 (1985)
Effective Date
1985-04-22

Other Sections in This Document (121)

Full Text

435 chars
at 534. Therefore, the district court held that the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) rendered the post-petition warrant of eviction legally ineffective, and that under 11 U.S.C. § 365 the debtor could remain on the premises, “so long as current rent is timely paid” and so long as he cured the default by paying off the back rent “within such time as [the bankruptcy court] may find to be a reasonable time.” Id. at 534, 535-36.