Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Citation
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-06-27
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
Full Text
860 charsCount II involved the transactions between the Bullocks and the corporation. The trial court made no findings of fact and expressed no basis for the judgment it entered. While some of the credits and debits were agreed to, many were not. We are unable to divine from the judgment entered which claims of the parties the trial court has honored and which it has rejected. Nor can we determine the amounts of such claims as were honored. We can assume from the overall judgment in favor of the Bullocks that the trial court accepted the Bullocks’ version of the overall transaction. But that said, we still cannot determine what credits or debits or their amounts the court has factually determined should be granted to each of the parties. We therefore must remand Count II and that portion of the counterclaim sought by the corporation for further proceedings.