Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Citation
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-06-27
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
Full Text
677 charsWe look first to Count I. It involved essentially the transactions between Bullocks and Vito. The parties have stipulated that Bullocks are entitled to return of their security deposit. They have also stipulated that Vito is entitled to repayment of the balance of the loan, and the late charges on that loan, three months rent, the insurance premiums and the taxes. The items stipulated to cover all charges and credits involved in the transactions to which Vito and the Bullocks are the parties. Vito is owed $31,684.59 by Bullocks and they are owed $20,000 by him. Judgment on Count I should have been for Vito and he should have been awarded $11,684.59 on the counterclaim.