Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Citation
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Parent Document
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1983-06-14
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
Full Text
639 charsThe evidence shows without question that respondents took no “immediate action” to correct the parking situation, and did not do so within the 120 days specified. The contingency giving rise to appellant’s right to *275terminate the lease occurred, and it timely exercised that option. It appears as a matter of law that appellant is entitled to judgment upon its petition. Respondents argue that they are entitled to a reasonable time to correct the parking situation after notice to them of the termination upon that ground. The argument is untenable because the 120 day period is clearly referable to the time of execution of the lease.