Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Citation
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Parent Document
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1983-06-14
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
- Great Midwest Enterprises, Inc. v. Precht, 656 S.W.2d 272 (1983)
Full Text
913 charsPRITCHARD, Judge. The issue is whether appellant was entitled to terminate a restaurant lease because of respondents’ alleged failure, in accordance with a provision of the contract, to comply with ordinances governing the number of parking spaces to be provided for the restaurant. Appellant also claimed, under the lease, to be entitled to the value of “rattleware”, liquor and food inventory at its cost; to a return of its $10,000.00 security deposit; for loss of profit due to respondents’ failure to install a beer system within 30 days of appellant’s request therefor; and for damages for failure to create additional parking by removal of a fence, and failure to do additional grading, paving and striping of parking within 90 days of the closing of the lease agreement. Respondents filed an answer denying generally appellant’s allegations, and a counterclaim for the balance of rent due under the lease.