Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)

Citation
Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
Parent Document
Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2006-10-03

Full Text

304 chars
Appellant also contends that the trial court should not have entered judgment in favor of Respondents because the evidence established that the property was not left in a suitable condition and Appellant was required to incur substantial cost in cleaning up the items left on the property by Respondents.