Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Citation
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Parent Document
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2006-10-03
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1878345/smith-v-thomas/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
- Smith v. Thomas, 210 S.W.3d 241 (2006)
Full Text
477 charsment of Appellant’s cause of action and to impeach the credibility of Appellant’s witness. “An affirmative defense seeks to defeat or avoid the plaintiffs cause of action, and avers that even if the allegations of the petition are taken as true, the plaintiff cannot prevail because there are additional facts that permit the defendant to avoid the legal responsibility alleged.” Id. at 257; see also Rice v. James, 844 S.W.2d 64, 66 (Mo.App. E.D.1992) (quoting Parker v. Pine,