Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Citation
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Parent Document
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1993-10-12
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
Full Text
606 charsAfter this petition was filed, defendants filed a motion to dismiss arguing that the cause of action and issues were identical to the first lawsuit and could not be relitigated because of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. The trial court sustained defendants’ motion to dismiss. We reversed and remanded, holding that because dismissal of the first action was for failure to have a licensed attorney, the issues were not resolved on the merits and therefore the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel did not bar a subsequent action. Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King,