Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Citation
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Parent Document
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1993-10-12
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King, 863 S.W.2d 12 (1993)
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
Full Text
839 charsPESI also alleged in this count that the defendants refused to refund an undisputed portion of the security deposit unless PESI signed a release relinquishing all claims against the defendants arising out of the lease. Count III was based on a theory of wrongful failure to return a security deposit pursuant to § 535.300. In Count IV, PESI alleged a breach of contract theory based on the defendants’ alleged failure to return the entire security deposit and failure to return an undisputed portion unless PESI signed the release. In Count V, PESI alleged a theory of prima facie tort. PESI based this count on defendants’ alleged failure to return an undisputed portion of the deposit unless PESI signed the release. In all counts, PESI prayed for actual damages and for Counts I, II and V, $10,000,000 respectively, in punitive damages.