Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Citation
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Parent Document
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2015-02-20
Other Sections in This Document (77)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Younker v. Investment Realty, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 1 (2015)
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
Full Text
676 charsProperty Owners’ Motion for Summary Judgment set forth two legal bases in favor of summary judgment and their proper expenditure of Tenants’ security deposits. First, Property Owners assert that “these transactions are not controlled by statute but instead controlled by contract. Parties to a contract are free to relinquish substantial rights, and [Tenants] contractually waived any rights under § 535.300 RSMo. by entering into a contract with potentially different terms.” In their brief, Property Owners give several examples of rights that they allege may be waived9 as part of their overarching argument “that statutes can never bar personal choices in most instances.”