Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)

Citation
In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
Parent Document
In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1985-02-28

Other Sections in This Document (119)

Full Text

865 chars
Finally, in Bar Counsel’s cross examination of Respondent, Bar Counsel belatedly attempted to introduce the relevant documents in evidence and to elicit testimony from Respondent concerning his receipt of the documents. As in the case of the inadequate preparation charge, discussed at pages 7-9 above, Bar Counsel had once again failed to produce the relevant documents for the Respondent in conformity with the Chair’s pretrial ruling. For the reasons stated concerning the parallel point above, we once again find that the Hearing Committee’s reasonable pretrial ruling in this regard deserves to be enforced. We therefore recommend that the Court hold that the documentary evidence not be received because of Bar Counsel’s failure to comply with the procedures established by the Hearing Committee. In a more general way, Bar Counsel argues that the sui generis