In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- Citation
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- Parent Document
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 1985-02-28
Other Sections in This Document (119)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
- In Re Washington, 489 A.2d 452 (1985)
Full Text
1,413 charsWe try in all cases not to apply the rules of procedure to our Board in a wooden or mechanistic manner. However, certain rules must be complied with to insure the orderly presentation of evidence, absent particular circumstances justifying departure from the rules, none of which were asserted by Bar Counsel in this case. We feel a particular responsibility to enforce reasonable orders entered by the Chairs of our Hearing Committees. The Hearing Committees are charged with the difficult and burdensome task of conducting eviden-tiary hearings in the cases brought before the Board. When the Hearing Committees enter reasonable orders designed to protect the fairness of the proceedings before them and to ensure the integrity of their hearings, we will recommend to the Court of Appeals enforcement of those orders except where circumstances clearly do not justify the order entered. Bar Counsel offers no persuasive reason why the pretrial order entered by the Chair should not be enforced and we therefore recommend to the Court that no violation be found on this aspect of the case. We are further moved to the same result because the specification of charges attached to the petition in this case did not specifically charge as a violation Respondent’s failure to amend the complaint to increase the damages prayed for as allowed by the Maryland treble damages statute. 2 As a result, under In re Ruffalo,