Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

District of Columbia v. Towers (2021)

Citation
District of Columbia v. Towers (2021)
Parent Document
District of Columbia v. Towers (2021)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2021-05-13

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text

975 chars
We question the trial court’s determination that the landlords’ right to access
claim was ancillary to a claim under “[t]he United States Constitution [that] protects
the right of property owners to go to court to regain possession of their property in a
summary proceeding,” a right the court described as “time sensitive.” To be sure,
property owners have rights that are protected by various constitutional provisions,
but we are unaware that there is a constitutional right to evictions on a particular
timetable, notwithstanding prior descriptions in our cases of landlord-tenant
proceedings as “summary in nature.” Mahdi v. Poretsky Management, 433 A.2d
1085, 1088 (D.C. 1981); but cf. Hornstein, 560 A.2d at 532 & n.3 (describing
“comprehensive scheme of regulation [including eviction controls] designed to
protect the rights of tenants, particularly poor and elderly tenants who, in the
Council’s reasonable view, merit and need such protection” (footnote omitted)).