Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Oliver v. Mustafa, 929 A.2d 873 (2007)

Citation
Oliver v. Mustafa, 929 A.2d 873 (2007)
Parent Document
Oliver v. Mustafa, 929 A.2d 873 (2007)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2007-08-09

Other Sections in This Document (59)

Full Text

499 chars
Similarly, we decline to address Ms. Oliver’s arguments that the punitive damages were excessive, not supported by the evidence, and in violation of her due process rights under the Fifth Amendment. Though Judge Ross gave Ms. Oliver thirty days to file post-trial motions, she filed none. This court will not review a verdict for inadequate or excessive damages unless such arguments were made to the trial court in post-trial motions. Keener v. Karr, 528 A.2d 1236, 1237 (D.C.1987). Attorneys’ Fees