Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Oliver v. Mustafa, 929 A.2d 873 (2007)

Citation
Oliver v. Mustafa, 929 A.2d 873 (2007)
Parent Document
Oliver v. Mustafa, 929 A.2d 873 (2007)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2007-08-09

Other Sections in This Document (59)

Full Text

419 chars
Ms. Oliver also argues that it is impossible to tell from the jury’s verdict whether the punitive damages attached to the intentional tort claims or to the breach of contract claims. During deliberations, however, the jury sent the court a note asking the court to explain the difference between counts one (wrongful eviction) and two (breach of quiet enjoyment). After some discussion, the following exchange occurred: