Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Cline v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 690 S.W.2d 764 (1985)

Citation
Cline v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 690 S.W.2d 764 (1985)
Parent Document
Cline v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 690 S.W.2d 764 (1985)
Jurisdiction
Kentucky (state)
Effective Date
1985-05-24

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text

658 chars
The appellant contends that Crab-tree made an implied warranty of merchantability and its purported exclusion is ineffective under KRS 355.2-316. Under KRS 355.2-316, to include a warranty in a writing the language must be conspicuous and contain the term merchantability. The warranty provisions in the purchase order were on the reverse, side. Above the line for the purchaser’s signature, the contract refers, in print heavier than most of the contract, to the warranty, on the reverse side. The fact that an exclusion of any warranty appears on the back of a contract will not per se render the exclusion ineffective. Childers & Venters, Inc. v. Sowards,