Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Cline v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 690 S.W.2d 764 (1985)

Citation
Cline v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 690 S.W.2d 764 (1985)
Parent Document
Cline v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 690 S.W.2d 764 (1985)
Jurisdiction
Kentucky (state)
Effective Date
1985-05-24

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text

674 chars
The appellant also contends that Crab-tree misrepresented the combine as a 1982 model when in fact it was a 1980 model. The original complaint alleged fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of Crabtree. This allegation was decided in favor of Crabtree by summary judgment. However, the trial court reserved for trial the allegation in the complaint that Crabtree negotiated with the appellant the sale of a 1982 combine in July of 1982. We are not sure what effect the trial court intended by these seemingly conflicting rulings, but it is apparent that the question of which model year Crabtree represented is left to the jury. Hence, appellant’s argument is unnecessary.