Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Vericoals, Inc. v. Revenue Cabinet, 869 S.W.2d 49 (1994)

Citation
Vericoals, Inc. v. Revenue Cabinet, 869 S.W.2d 49 (1994)
Parent Document
Vericoals, Inc. v. Revenue Cabinet, 869 S.W.2d 49 (1994)
Jurisdiction
Kentucky (state)
Effective Date
1994-01-28

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text

433 chars
While Umt Coal had broad rights and responsibilities, it still appears that Vericoals had the economic interest in the coal in place. When the agreement ended, Unit Coal could remove its fixtures, but anything not removed would revert to Vericoals after 30 days. Thus Vericoals remained in control of the premises. We believe the substance of the contract upholds the conclusion that Veri-coals had the economic interest in the coal.