Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Citation
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Parent Document
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 2016-12-22
Other Sections in This Document (51)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
- Faciszewski v. Brown, 187 Wash. 2d 308 (2016)
Full Text
1,034 chars¶27 While the remedies under the JCEO provide an incentive for landlords to act fairly, nothing in the JCEO suggests that posteviction remedies are a tenant’s exclusive remedy once the landlord files a certification. Given that the JCEO is more protective of tenants than state law, it would seem odd that the ordinance would leave a tenant with a lesser ability to defend against an unlawful detainer when a landlord files a certification. Moreover, the remedy provisions of SMC 22.206.160(C)(6) and (7) do not rest on whether the landlord can prove just cause in an action to terminate a tenancy. Instead, they provide a separate cause of action if, after an eviction or attempted eviction on certain grounds, the landlord does not fulfill or carry out the stated reason. With respect to the eviction action itself, two provisions of the JCEO clearly provide that the landlord must have just cause, SMC 22.206.160(C)(1), and that the lack of just cause can be raised by the tenant defending against the action, SMC 22.206.160(C)(5).