Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

§ 9058

Citation
§ 9058
Parent Document
Hous. Auth. v. Knight, 563 P.3d 1058 (2025)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2025-02-20

Other Sections in This Document (328)

Full Text

517 chars
5
 Knight responds that “there is no presumption in favor of state power” in areas where Congress
has a “‘significant federal presence,’” such as subsidized housing. Pet’r Andre Knight’s Suppl.
Br. at 7 (regarding the clear statement rule (quoting United States v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89, 108,
120 S. Ct. 1135, 146 L. Ed. 2d 69 (2000))). Knight argues that Congress has a significant
presence of regulating housing through the spending clause and application of the clear statement 18
Hous. Auth. v. Knight, No. 102905-5