True, at the time the judgment was issued the rights of Mr. Wainsai may have been subordinate to and "extinguished by a judgment of possession in favor of the lessor." (170 W. 85th St. Tenants Assn. v Cruz, 173 AD2d 338, 339-340 [1st Dept 1991]; see also New York Rys. Corp. v Savoy Assoc., Inc., 239 App Div 504 [1st Dept 1933].) However, this court retains continuing jurisdiction over this matter even after entry of the judgment (see generally Matter of Brusco v Braun, 84 NY2d 674 [1994]; Matter of Lafayette Boynton Hsg. Corp. v Pickett, 135 AD3d 518 [1st Dept 2016]; Solack Estates v Goodman, 78 AD2d 512 [1st Dept 1980]), and for the warrant of eviction to be effective against a subtenant, licensee or occupant, due process requires that they properly be made a party to the proceeding (170 W. 85th St. Tenants Assn. v Cruz). The failure to do so, or to commence an appropriate new [*4]proceeding against such subtenant, licensee or occupant, would render unlawful the eviction of such a person pursuant to a warrant issued in this proceeding. (Parkash 2125 LLC v Galan, 61 Misc 3d 502 [Civ Ct, Bronx County 2018]; 115 Mulberry LLC v Giacobbe, 46 Misc 3d 1229[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50343[U] [Civ Ct, NY County 2015].)