Entry Regarding Motion Page 1 of 3
24-CV-03073 Barbara Giancola v. William Boyd
RENT for the months of February, March, April, May, June, July, August,
September, October, November, December 2023~ January, February, March, April,
and May 2024 For a Total Amount Due of $ 16,123.00.
Pursuant to Title 9 Vermont Statues Annotated; Section 4467 (a) the landlord
may terminate tenancy for nonpayment of monies by giving notice to the tenant at
least 14 days prior to the termination date specified in the notice.
Also, pursuant to Title 9 Vermont Statutes Annotated, Section 4467(a), you as
a tenant are NOTIFIED that you can stop the termination of the rental agreement,
(your tenancy) "if the tenant pays or tenders rent due through the end of the rental
period in which payment is made or tendered". The full amount of the past due
rent is required to be paid by the termination date listed above to stop your rental
agreement from terminating. If you tender (pay) the full amount of the past due
rent owing by the termination date, your tenancy will not be terminated.
Comp. Ex. C. The Defendant retained possession past July 1, 2024 and has not redeemed his
tenancy by paying the full amount of past rent due. This action was commenced on August 7, 2024.
Analysis
The Court starts with the premise that “[m]otions to dismiss for failure to state a claim are
disfavored and are rarely granted.” Colby v. Umbrella, Inc., 2008 VT 20, ¶ 5. Ejectment proceedings
are governed by Title 12, Chapter 169 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated. In order to terminate a
tenancy, a landlord must provide written notice to the tenant. 9 V.S.A. §§ 4451(a) and 4467(a). The
date of termination shall be at least 14 days after actual notice is provided to the tenant. 9 V.S.A. §
4467(a).
When a landlord seeks to evict a tenant, Vermont law requires strict compliance with notice
requirements. Vermont Small Business Development Corp. v. Fifth Son Corp., 2013 VT 7, ¶ 15 (“With
respect to the termination of residential leases, we have followed the trend in other jurisdictions to
require punctilious compliance with all statutory eviction procedures, including notice
requirements.”) (citations and quotations omitted). When a landlord fails to strictly comply with
notice requirements, they are not entitled to evict the tenant. Id.; Andrus v. Dunbar, 2005 VT 48, ¶
15. Defendant argues that in order for a notice of termination to be valid, it must comply with the
requirements of the Vermont Consumer Protection Act (VCPA).
The purpose of the VCPA is “to protect this state’s citizens from unfair and deceptive
business practices and to encourage a commercial environment highlighted by integrity and
fairness.” RSD Leasing, Inc. v. Navistar Internation Corporation, 2024 VT 33, ¶ 6 (quoting Gramatan
Home Invs. Corp. v. Starling, 143 Vt. 527, 536 (1983)). The VCPA “applies to residential landlord-
tenant transactions.” Terry v. O’Brien, 2015 VT 132, ¶ 27. The Attorney General is authorized under
the VCPA to adopt rules relating to unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce. 9 V.S.A. §
2453(c). “Violation of a rule adopted by the Attorney General is prima facie proof of the
commission of an unfair or deceptive act in commerce.” 9 V.S.A. § 2453(d). The VCPA allows a
consumer who has been damaged or injured as a result of a violation of the Attorney General’s rules
adopted under § 2453 to “sue for appropriate equitable relief and may sue and recover … the
Entry Regarding Motion Page 2 of 3
24-CV-03073 Barbara Giancola v. William Boyd
amount of his or her damages, or the consideration or the value of the consideration given by the
consumer, reasonable attorney’s fees, and exemplary damages not exceeding three times the value of
the consideration given by the consumer.” 9 V.S.A. § 2461(b).
The Vermont Attorney General has adopted Consumer Protection Rules pursuant to 9
V.S.A. § 2453(c). Rule 104.04, Deceptive Representations, states that unfair and deceptive acts
under § 2453(a) include:
The failure to clearly disclose in all written communications made to the debtor or to
members of the debtor's family in order to collect or attempt to collect a claim or to
obtain information about a debtor that the debt collector is attempting to collect a
claim and any information obtained will be used for that purpose.
C.P. 104.04(b). Defendant argues that the notice of termination is an attempt by the Plaintiff to
collect a debt, thus subject to Rule 104.04(b). The court disagrees. “When construing an
administrative rule or regulation, we use the same rules that we use in construing a statute. In so
doing, the primary rule is to give language its plain, ordinary meaning.” Slocum v. Department of Social
Welfare, 154 Vt. 474, 478 (1990) (citations omitted). The plain language of Rule 104.04 makes clear it
applies only to written communications made “in order to collect or attempt to collect a claim.” CP
104.04(b). The Rule does not apply to communications between a creditor and debtor that are not
made for the purpose of collecting or attempting to collect a debt.
The purpose of a notice of termination is to give notice to a tenant that their tenancy is
being terminated. The Vermont Supreme Court made clear that “[t]he ejectment statute allows an
action for possession where the former lessee ‘holds possession of the demised premises without
right, after the termination of the lease.’” Andrus v. Dunbar, 2005 VT 48, ¶ 10 (quoting 12 V.S.A. §
4851). The action “sounds in tort,” and “provides a summary remedy for a landlord whose tenant
holds over without right after the determination of the lease.” Sabourin v. Woish, 116 Vt. 385, 387
(1950) (citing Barnes v. Tenney, 52 Vt. 557, 558 (1880) (“[T]he writ in an action of ejectment . . . runs
against the body.”)). In order to properly terminate a tenancy, courts “have been insistent upon the
landlord’s punctilious compliance with all statutory eviction procedures, including notice
provisions.” In re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26, ¶ 14 (citations and quotations omitted). This includes
language in a notice of termination that an eviction due to nonpayment of rent may be cured “if the
tenant pays or tenders rent due through the end of the rental period in which payment is made or
tendered.” 9 V.S.A. § 4467(a). The landlord’s requirement to include the redemption language is
not an attempt to collect a debt, but rather a statutorily required element of a valid notice of
termination. As such, Rule 104.04(b) does not apply to a notice of termination.
For the forgoing reasons, the court concludes Plaintiff’s notice of termination was valid.
The motion to dismiss is therefore DENIED.
Electronically signed on December 9, 2024 pursuant to V.R.E.F. 9(d)