Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Electric Man, Inc. v. Charos, 179 Vt. 351 (2006)

Citation
Electric Man, Inc. v. Charos, 179 Vt. 351 (2006)
Parent Document
Electric Man, Inc. v. Charos, 179 Vt. 351 (2006)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2006-02-10

Full Text

380 chars
¶ 10. Here, as in L’Esperance, the claims at issue share a common core of facts and multiple theories of recovery. Virtually all of the evidence is relevant to all of the claims. The lawsuit cannot “be viewed as a series of discrete claims.” L’Esperance, 203 VT 43, ¶ 24. Apportioning the fee award based on the recovery on each claim was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion.