Vermont Small Business Development Corp. v. Fifth Son Corp., Henzel, Mad Partners, LLC and Pierson, 193 Vt. 185 (2013)

Citation: Vermont Small Business Development Corp. v. Fifth Son Corp., Henzel, Mad Partners, LLC and Pierson, 193 Vt. 185 (2013)
Parent Document: Vermont Small Business Development Corp. v. Fifth Son Corp., Henzel, Mad Partners, LLC and Pierson, 193 Vt. 185 (2013)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2013-01-25
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1043650/vermont-small-business-developm... ↗

Full Text

424 chars

inapplicable, we would not do so in this case. We not only agree with the Court of Appeals of Georgia that such a provision would have to be “‘an explicit and detailed provision . . . which clearly and unequivocally expressed the parties’ intention to hold the lessee responsible for after-accrued rent even should an eviction take place,’ ” Fuel Marketing, Inc., 601 S.E.2d at 127 (quoting Bentley-Kessinger, Inc. v. Jones,

Other Sections in This Document (57)

Full Text