Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 51946-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
1,725 charsJames’s attorney’s testimony did not violate Smith’s right to present a defense; (2) defense counsel’s performance was not deficient for failing to request limiting instructions regarding James’s prior statements and bad acts; and (3) as the State concedes, the criminal filing fee imposed as a legal financial obligation (LFO) must be stricken from the judgment and sentence. ADDITIONAL FACTS James and Broussard also were charged in relation to these transactions, and their cases were joined with Smith’s case for trial. Before trial, James entered a guilty plea. James’s Statement of Plea of Guilty included a section for him to state in his own words what made him guilty. That section stated that (1) James had knowingly used the social security numbers of other people to obtain loans for vehicles he did not intend to buy, including the $14,840 loan from Inspirus Credit Union; (2) Smith had opened the Wells Fargo accounts for A.J. Motors 15 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 51946-1-II knowingly using the Indiana child’s social security number; (3) Smith knew that James deposited the $14,840 check from Inspirus in the A.J. Motors account; (4) all three brothers made withdrawals from the business accounts; and (5) James, Smith, and Broussard all were working together and each knew what the other two were doing. James initialed next to the beginning of this section and signed at the end of the guilty plea statement. James’s Trial Testimony At trial, the prosecutor asked James about his guilty plea statement. Q. [Y]ou entered a guilty plea, right? A. Of course. Q. And in that guilty plea you said, during the period between April 12th –