Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
1,737 charsRoundup Corp., 148 Wn.2d 35, 48 n. 5, 59 P. 3d 611 ( 2002).
Under this test, we analyze whether Martinez was a " manager "; so we must review
whether he enjoyed the authority to affect the hours, wages, and working conditions of Qwest
employees. See Robel, 148 Wn. 2d at 48 n. 5. Here, the record includes evidence that Martinez, a
QTI Operation Supervisor, set his crew' s hours; for example, in a June 2010 e -mail, Martinez
advised his crew of their new work schedules and start times. Alonso declared that Martinez
assigned him new work hours against Alonso' s will; and, Alonso stated, " Martinez changed my
position from working at AQCB to working in the Central Office." Suppl. CP at 234. Evidence
also shows that Martinez managed how employees were to spend their work days on certain
10
No. 43703 -1 - II
projects; and he controlled overtime and placement on out -of town
- projects. Under Robel,
because Martinez had authority to affect employees' hours, wages ( at least in the context of who
could earn overtime), and working conditions, he qualified as a manager, at least for summary
judgment purposes. See 148 Wn.2d at 48 n. 5. Alonso produced evidence that Martinez
personally participated in some of the harassment, using " Spics" to describe Mexicans, CP at
115, and characterizing Alonso as " not a real Mexican," CP at 114, and not speaking good
English; thus, Alonso has demonstrated that the harassment is imputable to Qwest through
Martinez. See Glasgow, 103 Wn.2d at 407. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to.
Alonso, we hold that he has established a prima facie hostile work environment claim and, thus,