Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43703-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
1,796 charstime card to read that he had only worked 8 hours. Martinez also threatened to change Alonso
from a 4 -day, 10 -hour work week, to a 5 -day, 8 -hour work week.
Eventually, Martinez reassigned Alonso from AQCB back to the central office.
According to Alonso, Martinez also forced him to trade his " nice" work van for " an old junky
van" and required Alonso to return his cellular telephone and computer. Suppl. CP at 234, 235.
Alonso stated that Martinez did not select him for " lucrative ` per diem' jobs" 7 and barred him
from earning overtime. Suppl. CP at 235. As Buechel characterized it, " After Ben started
looking at Joseph [ Alonso,] negative things began to happen to Joseph." CP at 145. For
example, one day, when Alonso was away from his desk, either Tuttle or Zuniga spread hand
sanitizing liquid over Alonso' s desk telephone, to the point that it was dripping.
At other times,
Zuniga glued a computer mouse to the mouse pad at Alonso' s work station; and someone applied
a greasy substance to Alonso' s mouse. Alonso also once found a wet puddle in his work chair.
6 Other employees, including Martinez, Laurie Gonce, Jonathan King, Tuttle, Zuniga, Matthew
Dillon, and Shawn Breer, all continued to use their Qwest- issued cellular telephones.
7 Alonso characterized " per diem jobs" as out -of t-own projects that have potential to yield higher
earnings. According to Alonso, Thomas, Tuttle, and others " worked several weeks and even
several months per year" in those jobs. Suppl. CP at 238. Martinez denied Alonso' s claim,
saying that he had never denied Alonso a per diem job.
5
No. 43703 -1 - II
II. PROCEDURE
Alonso filed a complaint against Qwest under the Washington Law Against