Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Citation
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Parent Document
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-11-06
Other Sections in This Document (22)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
- Woloohojian Realty Corp. v. Beltran, 03-2591 (2003) (2003)
Full Text
588 charsDefendant objected to the eviction on the basis that R.I.G.L. §34-18-36 requires a written notice to the tenant if there is a non-compliance with the rental agreement, affording the tenant twenty days to cure said breach, and that the notice did not provide said right to cure. The defendant further argues that the only exception to the right to cure, namely, violation of subsections 8, 9 or 10 of R.I.G.L § 34-18-24 did not apply to her because she was not convicted of a crime of violence and, accordingly, did not fall within the exception and should have been given a right to cure.