Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Citation
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Parent Document
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-03-22
Other Sections in This Document (60)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
- Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)
Full Text
796 charsAs the plaintiff rightly claims, in certain circumstances, a tenant could have the entire value of the rent subsidized by the federal government. Under the court’s interpretation of “one month’s rent,” such a tenant who suffers an illegal entry would be entitled to no damages, absent attorney’s fees, while a tenant who pays full rental value would be entitled to damages. We know of no public policy that would support such a result. More specifically, we find no language in the applicable statutory scheme that warrants the disparate treatment of tenants based on the amount of rent they actually pay. We therefore hold that the phrase “one month’s rent” as utilized in § 47a-18a includes both the tenant’s portion as well as the subsidized portion of the rent payments made to a landlord. II