Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Nielsen v. Wisniewski, 32 Conn. App. 133 (1993)

Citation
Nielsen v. Wisniewski, 32 Conn. App. 133 (1993)
Parent Document
Nielsen v. Wisniewski, 32 Conn. App. 133 (1993)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1993-07-20

Full Text

416 chars
At no time did the defendants file a motion asking to have the referee recused. By its rectification and articulation, the trial court concluded that there was “no reason to deem the original report tainted by improper influence” and found that the attorney trial referee’s corrected report “does not substantially differ from the original report and incorporates some of the corrections proposed by the defendants.”