Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Citation
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-05-20
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
Full Text
698 charsWhen the landlord did not make payment as ordered, the commissioner filed an action seeking to enforce the order pursuant to General Statutes § 36a-50 (b) (1) and seeking the levy of an additional penalty, pursuant to § 36a-50 (b) (2), for the landlord’s failure to adhere to the order.7 The landlord filed an answer denying several of the commissioner’s findings and by way of special defense claimed that she had damages related to the tenancy at issue. Thereafter, the court, in essence, conducted a de novo trial, taking testimony and documentary evidence, before granting the commissioner’s request to have the order enforced with the assessment of an additional penalty. This appeal followed.