Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 687271.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 687271.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,754 chars
properly served and received adequate notice, the court denied Feigenbaum's

motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The court ordered that $12,700 of the

funds held in the court's registry be released to Hall.

On August 30, 2011, Hall relet the premises to a new tenant. The new

tenant's lease provided for rent lower than the monthly rent that Feigenbaum

paid.

On January 9, 2012, Feigenbaum filed a motion asking that the trial court

clarify whether the court had converted the unlawful detainer action into an
             

No. 68727-1-1 (consol. with
No. 68927-4-1) / 4

ordinary civil action. On February 10, 2012, the court entered an order stating

that it had done so.

On April 13, 2012, the court granted Hall summary judgment for

$136,809.29. The judgment included rent through December 31, 2011,

decreased rent from January 1, 2012, to August 31, 2013, and costs related to

mitigation and cleaning. On July 2, 2012, the court awarded Hall costs and

reasonable attorney fees totaling $43,000.00, bringing the final judgment to

$179,807.29. Feigenbaum appeals.

ANALYSIS

Waiver of Certain Issues on Appeal

Feigenbaum appealed a number of the trial court's orders in this lengthy

litigation but did not address them in his opening brief. We deem an issue not

briefed to be waived.2 We decline to review these orders. Moreover, although

Feigenbaum assigns error on appeal to the trial court's issuance of the temporary

restraining order and preliminary injunction, he did not raise the associated

issues below. An appellate court "may refuse to review any claim of error which

was not raised in the trial court."3 Consequently, we decline to review them here.