IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ^ ^3C
f£rnc
ROBERT K. HALL, a single man, NO. 68727-1-1 ^ "§£.
and DAYLIGHT PROPERTIES, LLC,
a Washington limited liability company, (Consolidated with
No. 68927-4-1)
Respondents,
DIVISION ONE
v.
MATTHEW FEIGENBAUM and JANE PUBLISHED OPINION
DOE FEIGENBAUM, husband and
wife, and the marital community
comprised thereof,
Appellants. FILED: January 13, 2014
Leach, C.J. — In this commercial unlawful detainer action, Matthew
Feigenbaum appeals multiple trial court orders, based primarily upon allegations
that Robert Hall failed to comply with the notice requirements of the parties' lease
and applicable statutes. Because Hall complied with these notice requirements
and Feigenbaum does not otherwise show reversible error, we affirm and award
Hall attorney fees incurred on appeal.
FACTS
In 2003, Matthew Feigenbaum entered into a commercial lease with
Robert K. Hall to operate a nightclub (premises). The lease provided that
Feigenbaum's failure "to keep and perform any of the covenants and agreements
No. 68727-1-I (consol. with
No. 68927-4-I) / 2
[that] continues for twenty (20) days after written notice from Lessor" would
entitle Hall to either terminate and reenter or continue the lease and sublet the
space. The lease specified that "[a]ny notice required to be given ... to the
Lessee" would use the address of the premises or "such other address as either
party may designate to the other in writing."
At some point, Feigenbaum stopped operating the nightclub.1 He did not
pay rent for September and October 2010. On November 5, 2010, Hall served
Feigenbaum with a three-day notice to pay or vacate by posting and mailing to