Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Gateway Development/East Lyme, LLC v. Duong, 227 Conn. App. 38 (2024)

Citation
Gateway Development/East Lyme, LLC v. Duong, 227 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
Parent Document
Gateway Development/East Lyme, LLC v. Duong, 227 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2024-07-30

Other Sections in This Document (42)

Full Text

828 chars
denied, 348 Conn. 910, 303 A.3d 11 (2023). ‘‘The court
       will not torture words to impart ambiguity where ordi-
       nary meaning leaves no room for ambiguity. . . . More-
       over, the mere fact that the parties advance different
       interpretations of the language in question does not
       necessitate a conclusion that the language is ambigu-
       ous. . . . [A]ny ambiguity in a contract must emanate
       from the language used by the parties. . . . The con-
       tract must be viewed in its entirety, with each provision
       read in light of the other provisions . . . and every
       provision must be given effect if it is possible to do
       so.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Heyman Asso-
       ciates No. 5, L.P. v. FelCor TRS Guarantor, L.P., supra,
       153 Conn. App. 403–404.