ECR 2, LLC v. Thompson (2025)

Citation: ECR 2, LLC v. Thompson (2025)
Parent Document: ECR 2, LLC v. Thompson (2025)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2025-05-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10586504/ecr-2-llc-v-thompson/ ↗

Full Text

1,519 chars

CRADLE, J. In this summary process action, the
       defendant, Raschid Thompson, appeals from the judg-
       ment of possession, rendered after a court trial, in favor
       of the plaintiff, ECR 2, LLC. On appeal, the
       defendant claims that the court (1) violated his
       constitutional right to due process by denying his
       motion for a continuance of the trial date and refusing
       to consider his motion to preclude evidence and
       testimony that had not previously been disclosed
       by the plaintiff; (2) applied the wrong legal standard in
       rejecting his special defense of equitable nonforfeiture;
       and (3) erred in rejecting his special defense that he
       had a right to cure, and did cure, his nonpayment of
       rent. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
         The following facts, as set forth by the trial court,
       and procedural history are relevant to our consideration
       of the defendant’s claims on appeal. ‘‘The defendant is
       a veteran who was honorably discharged after serving
       in the United States Air Force from 1993 to 1997. He
       receives [United States Department of] Veterans Affairs
       disability benefits as well as rental assistance and [the
       assistance of] a case management counselor through
       the [United States] Department of Housing and Urban
       Development-VA Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) pro-
       gram.
Page 2                  CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                      0, 0

Other Sections in This Document (45)

Full Text