Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Housing Authority of New Haven v. Martin, 898 A.2d 245 (2006)

Citation
Housing Authority of New Haven v. Martin, 898 A.2d 245 (2006)
Parent Document
Housing Authority of New Haven v. Martin, 898 A.2d 245 (2006)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2006-06-06

Other Sections in This Document (68)

Full Text

723 chars
After the plaintiff filed its amended complaint, the defendant filed a motion to strike all of the plaintiffs claims because the plaintiff did not allege that the defendant had failed to remedy the alleged lease and statutory violations within the time provided by General Statutes § 47a-15. The defendant claimed that the plaintiffs complaint, absent that allegation, failed to state a legally sufficient cause of action. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s breach was not subject to the cure provisions of the statute. In its memorandum of decision filed November 19, 2004, the court concluded that a landlord in a summaiy process action must allege that it complied with the pretermination notice requirements and