Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Tarka v. Filipovic, 45 Conn. App. 46 (1997)

Citation
Tarka v. Filipovic, 45 Conn. App. 46 (1997)
Parent Document
Tarka v. Filipovic, 45 Conn. App. 46 (1997)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1997-05-06

Full Text

988 chars
As a prehminary matter, we must examine the procedures that govern matters heard by an attorney referee. See Practice Book § 428 et seq. An attorney referee “is obliged to report to the court ‘the facts found and the conclusions drawn therefrom,’ but the report may be supplemented with a ‘memorandum of decision including such matters as [the attorney referee] may deem helpful in the decision of the case . . . .’ Practice Book § 434.” Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc., 199 Conn. 496, 503, 508 A.2d 415 (1986). The parties may seek additions or corrections in the facts contained in this report by filing a motion to correct with the attorney referee pursuant to Practice Book § 438.7 After the attorney referee responds to any motions to correct, the parties may file with the trial court exceptions to findings of *51fact pursuant to Practice Book § 4398 or objections to factual conclusions or rulings pursuant to Practice Book §440.9 Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc., supra, 503, 518.