Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Citation
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Parent Document
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1987-04-02
Other Sections in This Document (40)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
- Jinwala v. Bizzaro, 505 N.E.2d 904 (1987)
Full Text
563 charsWe think that the language of G. L. c. 186, § 15B(6), the purposes for which the statute was enacted and the legislative history make clear that the Legislature meant what it said, i.e., that a landlord in violation of the security deposit law would be barred only from making a claim against the tenant for damage to the premises by way of counterclaim in an action by the tenant to recover the security deposit. In this context, we give the word “counterclaim” its ordinary legal meaning. See G. L. c. 4, § 6, cl. Third; Arthur A. Johnson Corp. v. Commonwealth,