Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

JACOB SLATER & another v. TRAYNOR MANAGEMENT, INC., & another., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 705 (2022)

Citation
JACOB SLATER & another v. TRAYNOR MANAGEMENT, INC., & another., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 705 (2022) 2.
Parent Document
JACOB SLATER & another v. TRAYNOR MANAGEMENT, INC., & another., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 705 (2022)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2022-09-16

Other Sections in This Document (74)

Full Text

534 chars
2. Landlord's attempt to "return" deposit. The landlord next argues that summary judgment was erroneous because, in light of Traynor's claimed telephone call to Slater offering to meet at the management office, there remained a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the landlord had violated the requirement to return the deposit within thirty days of the end of the tenancy. "We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, construing all facts in favor of the nonmoving party." Miller v. Cotter, 448 Mass. 671, 676 (2007).