JACOB SLATER & another v. TRAYNOR MANAGEMENT, INC., & another., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 705 (2022)

Citation: JACOB SLATER & another v. TRAYNOR MANAGEMENT, INC., & another., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 705 (2022)
Parent Document: JACOB SLATER & another v. TRAYNOR MANAGEMENT, INC., & another., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 705 (2022)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2022-09-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10271865/jacob-slater-another-v-traynor... ↗

Full Text

704 chars

At the motion hearing, the judge first heard argument on the landlord's discovery motion. She concluded that Slater's objections were sufficient and that allowing the motion would not produce any relevant or material evidence; she therefore denied it from the bench. The judge then heard argument on the tenants' summary judgment motion and took it under advisement. At no time during the argument did the landlord object that, given the denial of its discovery motion, it needed additional time to prepare a more substantive summary judgment opposition than it had already filed. [Note 10] Indeed, the landlord was able to make the same argument about counsel's demand letter -- that the letter Page 710

Other Sections in This Document (74)

Full Text