Showing 1–20 of 43 results
Security Deposit Refund. Upon termination of Resident’s right to occupy the premises, the security deposit shall be returned to Resident in accordance with the following terms and conditions: (a) All of the security deposit will be retained by Owner
termination**.” The next day, the Cromars sent a letter to TAG Realty requesting that the balance of their security deposit be returned on the ground that forfeiture of the deposit due to early lease termination is not permitted under
month and paid a $1,400 security deposit. The lease agreement contained a provision governing return of the security deposit, which specified that the landlord could retain the deposit if the tenant terminated without proper notice
emphasis added). Thus, ECM was obligated to return the Phase 2 deposit if it breached the PSA; however, the obligation with regard to the Phase 2 deposit was not secured with the Phase 2 property. Based on the terms
Cromars double damages for a total of $4,400. It is undisputed that TAG Realty did not return the Cromars’ security deposit until the entry
withholding a portion of their security deposit. If proved, this claim would entitle the Lewises to a return of their full security deposit plus double damages and attorney fees and costs. The Ridgways moved for partial For the current opinion
seeking to recover his security deposit. The tenant claimed that he is entitled to recover his security deposit because the landlord failed to return it or to provide a full and specific statement of the basis for retaining it within
Heston. COUNT 10 – SECURITY DEPOSIT Mr. Christensen asserts the trial court erred in concluding his refusal to return Ms. Heston’s security deposit constituted a violation of former RCW 59.18.280(1) (2016). Mr. Christensen claims that, under former
Ridgway et al., No. 101329-9 de novo. The Lewises again prevailed on their sole claim for return of their security deposit. Both parties then moved for attorney fees and costs under various statutes. The Ridgways sought attorney fees
half times her monthly rental amount on counts 2 through 9. The trial court ordered Mr. Christensen return Ms. Heston’s security deposit and imposed 4 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 39271-6-III Heston
ordinary use of the premises.” Id. But if Silver prevails on the merits of his complaint, Rudeen must return Silver’s deposit in full. RCW 59.18.280(2). This analysis leads us to conclude that the three-year statute of limitations
part of the receivership estate and (2) that LGI was entitled to return of the deposit prior to distribution of the receivership estate assets to secured creditors. Because Washington’s receivership statute, chapter 7.60 RCW, provides that a receiver
www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. Silver v. Rudeen Mgmt. Co. No. 98024-1 Silver’s action seeks to recover his deposit. A security deposit is the tenant
deposit plus a penalty equal to her security deposit, as pennitted by RCW 59.18.280. On October 9-43 days after the Goodeills vacated their rental and 36 days after the Goodeills returned their last two keys to Madison-Madison sent
Goodeills paid $750.00 per month for rent, a $750.00 damage security deposit, and a $50.00 pet deposit. Ms. Goodeill completed a standard move-in condition report and returned it to Baker within the requisite time. She noted a number
deposit was not part of the receivership estate and that LGI was entitled to return of its deposit ahead of the estate’s secured creditors. CLS does not argue that LGI has no claims against the receivership estate; thus
short time frame for the landlord to return the deposit and provide an accounting for any withheld portion is imperative in order to meaningfully protect the tenant’s interest in their security deposit
deposit for early termination, a tenant who terminates under this section is entitled to the return of the full deposit, subject to RCW 59.18.020 and 59.18.280. (ii) If the landlord seeks reimbursement for damages from the landlord mitigation program pursuant
Preliminarily, Hoskins charged Tenants a security deposit of $2,800 despite a monthly rent of $2,395 in violation of SMC 7.24.035(A). While Hoskins promptly returned the overage when the tenants informed him of the violation
shall be released to [ECM] . . . provided that [ECM]’s obligation to return the Deposit to [LGI], to the extent required to do so under this [PSA], shall be secured by a mortgage lien against the [Property] in the form