Showing 21–40 of 43 results
opportunities for abuses in the determination of the amount of sec[]urity deposit to be returned to the tenant highlight the need for swift procedural remedies. In many cases the amount in controversy will prevent one from going to court
counts 2-9). Lastly, Mr. Christensen asserts the trial court erred in finding his refusal to return Ms. Heston’s security deposit constituted a violation of RCW 59.18.280(1) (count 10). The summary judgment procedure is designed to avoid
registry of the court in cash or other security as directed, of a sum not to exceed 10 percent of the amount of the bond, such deposit to be returned upon the performance of the conditions of release or forfeited
that she owed money to CDR, but disputed the amount. Gebreseralse argued she was entitled to credit for her security deposit because Washington law does not permit forfeiture of the deposit in its entirety. Gebreseralse requested the court grant partial
April 18, 2018, Guy and Mattler issued two rent checks that were returned for non- sufficient funds. Guy and Mattler also failed to pay the $1000 security deposit. On April 18, Tedford served Guy and Mattler with both
double the security deposit amount. He claims the evidence failed to establish that he intentionally refused to mail the statement or refund the deposit. Ms. Heston responds that it is undisputed that Mr. Christensen did not return the deposit within
depositing his ballot. Wash. Const, art. 6, § 6. The constitutional mandate for a secret ballot is implemented by statutes codified in Title 29A RCW. For example, all ballots, when received in their return envelopes, "must be placed in secure locations
CONCLUSION A tenant’s security deposit is the personal property of the tenant unless and until they breach their duties under the RLTA. When a landlord fails to return the deposit along with a full and specific statement for retaining
part of the deposit becomes the landlord’s until the breach.” (footnote omitted)). Also, the RLTA provisions governing security deposits 11 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. Silver v. Rudeen Mgmt. Co. No. 98024-1 are among
from the Lewises’ security deposit. Crossroads complied over Smith’s objection. After repairing the damage, the Ridgways e-mailed Crossroads invoices and receipts for repairs totaling $1,526.01. Crossroads mailed the statement of damages and a deposit refund check
from its passage in 1973 until this amendment over 40 years later, the landlord was required to return the deposit and provide the statement within 2 weeks of the termination of the tenancy. Compare LAWS OF 1973, 1st Ex. Sess
liability to the Cromars until they obtained summary judgment after having been forced to litigate their right to their security deposit for months. Then, TAG Realty argued that the Cromars’ counsel’s communication regarding settlement was a waste of their
lease. Hoskins incurred various costs for cleaning and repairs to return the Property to its prior condition, and he subtracted those charges from Tenants’ remaining security deposit. After Tenants informed Hoskins that they would be moving
argues in the alternative that the Receiver’s obligation to return the Phase 2 deposit “constitutes an administrative expense of the Receivership that takes priority over CLS’s secured claim under RCW 7.60.230(1)(b).” Br. of Resp
claim falls below that of secured creditors of the receivership estate, and the superior court erred when it ordered that LGI is entitled to return of its deposit prior to any other receivership estate distributions. Therefore, we affirm in part
amount of surety may be increased or decreased from time to time by the director. The income from any securities deposited may be distributed currently to the self -insurer. RCW 51. 14. 020( 2) ( emphasis added). Thus, under Washington
where the same has been buried or deposited awaiting burial or cremation, without authority of law, with intent to sell the same, or for the purpose of securing a reward for its return, or for dissection, or from malice
Motors. On June 29, the check was deposited into A.J. Motors’ bank account. This deposit was the first and only deposit of funds into the account. On July 1, Smith returned to the Wells Fargo branch where he had opened
seller and control person. They included Donnerstag's and Robert Roberts's depositions. Donnerstag stated that he had (1) never been licensed to sell securities, (2)worked with Robert Roberts for years, and had communicated with Roberts about 50 times
Defendant shall execute a bond in the amount of $500,000 and deposit in the registry of the court in [sic] $50,000 cash or other security.... " CP at 13 (Order (Oct. 18, 2012)). Barton appealed the bail order