Showing results 21–40
landlord may collect a security deposit from a tenant only if the lease is in writing and includes the terms and conditions under which any portion of the deposit may be withheld by the landlord. RCW 59.18.260. Before collecting
suit against Madison in the small claims court division of district court, seeking $1,600.00, which represented her $800.00 security deposit plus a penalty equal to her security deposit, as pennitted by RCW 59.18.280. On October 9-43 days after
next month's rent. (ii) If the Resident vacates the premises prior to the expiration of the lease, the security deposit will be completely forfeited and not applied against any amounts owing by the Resident, and Resident shall be obligated
This understanding of the nature of the security deposit is consistent with recent revisions to the URLTA, which clarify that the security deposit remains the property of the tenant and that the landlord’s interest in the deposit is limited
Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 1973 (RLTA), ch. 59.18 RCW, including by intentionally withholding a portion of their security deposit. If proved, this claim would entitle the Lewises to a return of their full security deposit plus double damages
novo. The Lewises again prevailed on their sole claim for return of their security deposit. Both parties then moved for attorney fees and costs under various statutes. The Ridgways sought attorney fees and costs under RCW 7.06.060, which authorizes fees
purposes of RCW 19.52.010. Rather, Mr. Christensen wrongfully rejected payment made on behalf of Ms. Heston. COUNT 10 – SECURITY DEPOSIT Mr. Christensen asserts the trial court erred in concluding his refusal to return Ms. Heston’s security deposit constituted
security deposit was carried over from the plaintiffs’ initial lease. 2 In the letter, plaintiffs noted that TAG Realty rescinded its initial charge for the blind. 3 The record shows that the firm started billing for work for the plaintiffs
findings and conclusions regarding SMC 7.24.035(A), 7.24.035(B)(4), and 7.24.030(C)(1). Preliminarily, Hoskins charged Tenants a security deposit of $2,800 despite a monthly rent of $2,395 in violation of SMC 7.24.035(A). While Hoskins promptly
count 1), charges and late fees in violation of RCW 59.18.625 (counts 2-9), wrongful retention of her security deposit in violation of RCW 59.18.280 (count 10), requested a permanent injunction (count 11), and sought declaratory judgment (count
discussion of nonrefundable security deposit provisions. The lease provided that the tenant was liable for liquidated damages equivalent to one month of rent if the tenant breached any term of the lease. Id. at 25. The landlord had kept
Total Charges $557.09 Pl.'s Ex. 1 at 35. Madison applied a credit of$845.00, which represented the $800.00 security deposit and a $45.00 prepayment credit. The difference between the $845.00 credit and the total charges
ADDITION to your monthly rent payment, instead of a security deposit and/or last month's rent in the amount of $____. IF YOU CHOOSE TO PAY A MONTHLY DEPOSIT WAIVER FEE INSTEAD OF A SECURITY DEPOSIT, HERE IS THE AMOUNT
request for discretionary review to detennine whether RCW 59.18.280 precludes her landlord from retaining a portion of her security deposit because it failed to timely provide her a full and specific statement of the basis for retaining her deposit
www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 39271-6-III Heston v. Christensen Heston requested a refund of her $600 security deposit, less a $45 special handling fee, within 24 hours. Id. Mr. Christensen mailed Ms. Heston a final bill, postmarked on January
opts out of, or the landlord discontinues providing the option of, paying a continuing fee in lieu of a security deposit during the tenancy and the tenant provides full payment of a security deposit prior to the termination
that she owed money to CDR, but disputed the amount. Gebreseralse argued she was entitled to credit for her security deposit because Washington law does not permit forfeiture of the deposit in its entirety. Gebreseralse requested the court grant partial
deposited by the landlord in a trust account, maintained by the landlord for the purpose of holding such security deposits for tenants of the landlord, in a financial institution as defined by *RCW 30.22.041 or licensed escrow agent located
defenses applicable to the landlord. Thus, Gebreseralse’s claim is properly asserted against CDR. II. Forfeiture of the Security Deposit Gebreseralse argues that the superior court improperly reversed the district court and erred by refusing to credit
Thomas Bothwell, Comment, Washington Tenant Remedies and the Consumer Protection Act, 10 GONZ. L. REV. 559, 559 (1975). Security deposits were among the matters of residential leasing subject to new and significant regulation under Washington’s RLTA. The RLTA imposed