Skip to main content

Showing results 61–67

Rules of the City of New York § 1-15

New York City municipal Official source

Program in the manner set forth herein and as set forth in § 33.9 of the Rent and Eviction Regulations and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. If such office or department determines that a rent increase is required based

N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 27-2093.1

New York City municipal Official source

where there has been no prior determination of harassment, unlawful eviction, or arson by or on behalf of the owner, provide that a hearing be held at the office of administrative trials and hearings if the department has reasonable cause

N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 27-2093

New York City municipal Official source

sought during the stated period of time; or (iv) where there has been no prior determination of harassment, unlawful eviction or arson by or on behalf of the owner, provide that a hearing be held in the manner provided

N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 27-2093.1

New York City municipal Official source

program building and to report its findings to the department. The community group shall provide a copy of the notice required by this subdivision to occupants. Based upon the findings of such community group or the department's review

Sanjurjo v Milio, 2021 NY Slip Op 50208(U) [70 Misc 3d 1224(A)]

New York City municipal Official source

violations are nullities, he does not deny the existence of the underlying conditions. In any case, even if the notices of violations were not properly served on respondent, the violations themselves are prima facie proof that the conditions exist

N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 26-414

New York City municipal Official source

determined by the city rent agency, is five per centum or more, the controls imposed on rents and evictions by and pursuant to this chapter, with respect to the housing accommodations as to which such finding has been made, shall

Sanjurjo v Milio, 2021 NY Slip Op 50208(U) [70 Misc 3d 1224(A)]

New York City municipal Official source

such, respondent's second affirmative defense is dismissed. Respondent's third affirmative defense, which responds to petitioner's illegal eviction claim, will be discussed infra. Respondent's fourth affirmative defense essentially claims it is difficult for the landlord to ascertain