Showing 21–25 of 25 results
future, (iv) pay the wages and, if applicable, the monetary equivalent of the benefits that the employee subjected to retaliation or discrimination would have been granted or paid but for the adverse employment actions by the Covered Employer
Living Wage Law. Failure to maintain these records creates a rebuttable presumption that any adverse employment action was in retaliation for the applicable Employee exercising his or her rights under the Living Wage Law. (d) Obligation to Produce on Demand
this section; (4) the reinstatement of, or other appropriate relief for, any person found to have been subjected to retaliation or discrimination in violation of the Living Wage
future, (iv) pay the wages and, if applicable, the monetary equivalent of the benefits that the Employee subjected to retaliation or discrimination would have been granted or paid but for the adverse employment actions by the Covered Employer or Additional
tenants cannot be evicted. Finally, respondent asserts that the true purpose of this owner's use proceeding is retaliation because she has rallied the other tenants in the building against petitioner. (See Natalie Ulrich's affidavit, Sept