Showing 21–40 of 4,580 results
owner who is terminating a tenancy to "give the PHA [public housing authority] a copy of any owner eviction notice to the tenant," 24 CFR § 982.310(e)(2)(ii), with "owner eviction notice" defined as "a notice to vacate
VAWA notice noting "[a] plain reading of 24 CFR 5.2005 (a)'s notice provision requires that with any notice of eviction the covered housing provider 'must' with any notification of eviction provide the tenant a copy of the VAWA
petition) on the DHCR, even if the court were to find that proof of service of the "owner eviction notice" on the DHCR must be filed with the court, which it does not, the notice of petition
initiated and posted by the respondent. The respondent's witness testified that she did not know of the eviction notice, however, this testimony was not credible. The unauthorized use of a marshal's notice is unlawful and may be sanctionable
failure to serve the agency. Respondent contends that the petitioner was required to mail a copy of the eviction notice to the DHCR, pursuant to ETPR § 2504.3 (c). The Emergency Tenant Protection Regulations were recently amended. This amendment repealed
whether imposition of sanctions is proper, the Court must examine the circumstances and determine whether issuance of a Notice of Eviction after the warrant was vacated constitutes frivolous conduct within the meaning of Rule 130. This Court previously found that
landlord's application. By order to show cause returnable February 1, 2005, tenant, after being served with a notice of eviction, again moved to stay the warrant, arguing that its prior motion had been granted and that landlord had wrongfully
process protection. Thus, landlord must articulate a good cause basis for eviction before terminating respondent's tenancy. Notice of such reasons for eviction is required, [*4]and mere expiration of a lease is insufficient. Here, the notice of termination states
August 29, 2019, a deputy sheriff with respondent Albany County Sheriff's Department served the warrant of eviction and notice of eviction upon petitioner via the "nail and mail" method of service set forth in RPAPL 749 (2). Petitioner
time to pay $773.45, and execution of the warrant, until February 28, 2013. Landlord served Tenant with another notice of eviction. She then filed her sixth order to show cause returnable on April 5, 2013, when she signed a stipulation
However, on June 3, 2009, the landlord instructed the City Marshal to serve a six (6) day notice of eviction on the IP and the eviction occurred on June 12, 2009. The IP did not receive notice of the eviction
tenant that he or she has 20 days to move into such apartment or face eviction proceedings. Thus, ‘‘notices’’ in eviction proceedings which state that the tenant is given 20 days ‘‘to contact management to arrange such relocation
seeking to terminate a tenancy under the Section 8 program to give the housing administrator a copy of the eviction notice(s) served on tenants including the Notice of Petition and Petition. In the instant case, the petition states that
then, Petitioner would then reflexively avail itself of its right under the agreement to evict Respondent after serving an eviction notice; next, Respondent would travel to court to file an order to show cause requesting a stay of eviction
combined with any owner eviction notice, which is defined as a notice to vacate or initial pleading used under State or local law to commence an eviction proceeding, given to Tenant. Pursuant
amount of $955.38. Said amount was never paid by tenant. After receiving a 72-hour notice of eviction on September 12, 1983, respondent obtained an order to show cause and was directed to make a deposit into court
City of New York, New York County, March 21, 2025 HEADNOTES Landlord and Tenant — Eviction — Good Cause Eviction Law — Notice of Nonrenewal for Termination Predicated on Specific Cause Must Identify Legal Basis and Supporting Facts with Reasonable Level of Particularity
Court, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), entered on or about December 15, 2005, vacating the Marshal's notice of eviction in a holdover proceeding, and reinstated the notice of eviction, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Term correctly held
notice. Petitioner thereafter obtained the warrant of eviction, and the warrant was executed after Marshal's notice of eviction. Respondent Beauliere filed a post-eviction order to show cause on September 26, 2024. The emergency order to show cause
Federal Housing Program — Landlord Required to Provide No- tice of Occupancy Rights under Violence Against Women Act with Notice of Eviction Regardless of Proof That Tenant was Domestic Violence Victim RESEARCH REFERENCES By the Publisher’s Editorial Staff