Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Showing 1–15 of 15 results

Mont. Code Ann. § 70-25-202

Mont. Code Ann. § 70-25-202 Montana state

(b) (i) If after inspection there are no damages to the premises, no cleaning required, and no rent unpaid and if the tenant can demonstrate that no utilities are unpaid by the tenant, the landlord shall return the security deposit...

Mont. Code Ann. § 70-25-202

Mont. Code Ann. § 70-25-202 Montana state

(b) (i) If after inspection there are no damages to the premises, no cleaning required, and no rent unpaid and if the tenant can demonstrate that no utilities are unpaid by the tenant, the landlord shall return the security deposit...

Section 70-25-201

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

security deposit, and the security deposit should have been returned, minus any cleaning

§ 25-33-102

Guethlein v. Family Inn, 2014 MT 121 (2014) Montana state

for failing to return her security deposit within 30 days pursuant to the Montana

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010)

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

Summers contends that § 70-25-201(4), MCA, prohibits withholding future rent from the security deposit, and the security deposit should have been returned, minus any cleaning deductions, 30 days after termination of the tenancy in October.

§ 25-33-102

Guethlein v. Family Inn, 2014 MT 121 (2014) Montana state

who had also lived at Family Inn how her security deposit was returned. The friend told

§ 25-33-102

Guethlein v. Family Inn, 2014 MT 121 (2014) Montana state

2 asserted that, by failing to return the security deposit within 30 days, Family Inn forfeited

Hines v. Topher Realty LLC., 2018 MT 44 (2018)

Hines v. Topher Realty LLC., 2018 MT 44 (2018) Montana state

comply with § 70-25-201, MCA, and therefore, Hines was entitled to a return of her security deposit. We affirm. ¶2 We restate the issue on appeal as follows:

Geissler v. Nelson, 722 P.2d 632 (1986)

Geissler v. Nelson, 722 P.2d 632 (1986) Montana state

...Whether the District Court erred in finding that any of the security deposit monies were due and owing from Nelson to Geissler. Nelson first contends that Geissler's present action for the return of his security deposit given to secure...

Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)

Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995) Montana state

...IS the landlord entitled to the return of his appeal bond? Facts The tenants rented a residential unit from the landlord. The lease was a month-to-month agreement and required a $300 security deposit. Prior to the tenants moving...

Geissler v. Nelson, 722 P.2d 632 (1986)

Geissler v. Nelson, 722 P.2d 632 (1986) Montana state

that the matters in the parties1 previous lawsuit involving the lease agreement were "res judicata with the exception of the question of the security deposit which was not contemplated in the said action in Cause No. DV-83-537." Subsequent...

§ 70-25-201

Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995) Montana state

...The District Court awarded attorney fees to the tenants for those fees associated with the recovery of the tenants' security deposit. The court then ordered the tenants to file an affidavit of those fees and provided for a period of...

Geissler v. Nelson, 722 P.2d 632 (1986)

Geissler v. Nelson, 722 P.2d 632 (1986) Montana state

...Said security deposit shall be retained by landlord without interest until termination of this lease and provided that tenant has complied with all of the terms hereof and paid all of the rental, such amount shall be returned unto tenant...

Olson v. Long, 245 Mont. 492 (1990)

Olson v. Long, 245 Mont. 492 (1990) Montana state

...The respondents commenced an action in Justice Court in Hill County, Montana, where they reside, against the appellant for the return of a security deposit, rent diminution, and attorney fees. The appellant was served with service of process in Yellowstone...

Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)

Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914) Montana state

...he would return and sign it on the following day; and that, returning on the following day and asking for the lease in order that he might sign it, he took it away and did not thereafter return it. It...