Showing 1–20 of 20 results
...Return of security deposit. (a) Every landlord shall: (1) within three weeks after termination of the tenancy; or
...The tenant relinquishes all claims for the return of the security deposit under section 504B.178 and is relieved of any other contractual obligation for payment of rent or any other charges for the remaining term of the lease, except...
...Upon termination, all tenants relinquish all claims for the return of the security deposit under section 504B.178 and are relieved of any other contractual obligation for payment of rent or any other charges for the remaining term of the...
she should return to the premises so Driggs could give back the security deposit. After
ordered that the balance of the security deposits, $2,860, be returned to respondents. The
Under a pledgor-pledgee relationship, the lessor may commingle the security deposit funds but is prohibited from permanently disposing of the deposit or jeopardizing the possibility of returning the deposit to the lessee. See
The lessor pledges to return the security deposit if the lease terms are fulfilled. See id.
At trial, Schommer testified that appellant directed him not to return the security deposits to most of those customers who had fulfilled the terms of their automobile leases. Appellant denied directing Schom-mer to unlawfully withhold the deposits, but appellant...
...Appellant maintained that lease security deposits are merely a debt owed by the lessor to the lessee and, while this debt may be recovered in a civil action, failing to return the deposit funds could not form the basis for...
The state argued in summation to the jury that appellant committed theft at two different moments: (1) when appellant used the security deposit funds during the term of the leases, and (2) when appellant failed to return the deposits to...
. While this model affords the lessee a greater expectation that the security deposit will be returned, it does not place a trust-like limitation on the lessor’s commingling of the funds and has never been found to support a...
...receipt stating: “Deposit & 1st month rent.” Driggs’s position is that there was no lease agreement and that he requires applicants to pay a security deposit and first month’s rent with an application, which is returned if an application...
No. C7-98-712, 1999 WL 17666 (Minn.App. Jan. 19, 1999). Advance payments became the property of the receiver on receipt, the court reasoned, but security deposits “are returned, not repaid.” Id.
...Although some customers received their security deposits after the lease term, appellant failed to return hundreds of other customers’ security deposits. After receiving numerous complaints from SW Leasing customers, the state executed search warrants at SW Leasing on June 19...
...The heart of the present dispute is the two security deposits totaling $3,500.00. [Respondents] wanted the $3,500.00 returned. [Appellants] wanted to retain the $3,500.00 deposits and charge [respondents] an additional $1,425.00. Having...
Appellant argued that he intended to return the security deposits but his poor financial situation prevented him from doing it. Appellant also argued that his debt prevented him from remitting to the state the excise taxes collected from automobile sales.
...receipt stating: "Deposit & 1st month rent,” Driggs’s position is that there was no lease agreement and that he requires applicants to pay a security deposit and first month’s rent with an application, which is returned if an application...
...On February 10, Driggs left Cocchiarella a voicemail, stating that she should return to the premises so Driggs could give back the security deposit. After some discussion with Cocchiarel-la at the apartment, Driggs “changed his mind” and again told...
...Later that day, Driggs requested that Cocchiarella return on February 3 to sign a lease and that she bring $2,400 in cash for her security deposit and the February rent. Cocchiarella returned to the premises on February 3, paid...
...was criminal to commingle the security deposit funds with other business funds. In any event it seems clear, based upon the state’s presentation to the jury, that had the deposits in fact been returned, appellant would not have been...